<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>AAOMS.org - Practice Management and Allied Staff News</title>
<link>http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php</link>
<atom:link href="http://www.aaoms.org/feeds/pm_news.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<description>American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</description>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:12:42 PST</lastBuildDate><language>en-us</language>
 <item>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>FDA Updates Safety Alert for Steris Processor </title>
 <link>http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=113</link>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=113</guid>
 <author>webadmin@aaoms.org (Webmaster)</author>
 <description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) previously <a href="http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm191585.htm">issued a safety alert in December</a> for users of the Steris System 1 (SS1), which is a system for disinfecting and sterilizing instruments in healthcare facilities. The SS1 system is commonly used for surgical and endoscopy device disinfection and sterilization. After further consideration, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has extended the deadline from a three-six month transition period to 18 months for healthcare facilities to transition away from using the Steris System 1 (SS1) processor. The "FDA now understands that a three-to-six-month transition period may present significant difficulties for some healthcare facilities, which could, in turn, adversely affect patient care," the agency said. Using the FDA's original December 2009 announcement of the six-month period, this week's extension would bring the deadline to August 2011. Steris has been critical of the FDA's stance, saying there has been no documented case of infection caused by the SS1 when the equipment is used properly. For additional information, including information on FDA cleared or approved medical devices, see the "<a href="http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm192685.htm">Questions and Answers</a>" document and <a href="http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm194429.htm">list of FDA-cleared alternatives</a> to the STERIS System 1 (SS1) device processing system on the FDA Web site.</p>]]></description>
 </item>
 <item>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Use of the Medicare Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN)</title>
 <link>http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=31</link>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=31</guid>
 <author>webadmin@aaoms.org (Webmaster)</author>
 <description><![CDATA[Many members have requested clarification on how to determine when an Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage should be provided to Medicare patients. The intent of this article is to clarify this confusing area.

<h4>Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage (ABN)</h4>

<p>The ABN should be provided to a Medicare patient prior to rendering a service that Medicare might otherwise cover, however is likely to be denied on this particular occasion. For example, when you have good reason to expect the procedure will be denied based on other Medicare denials and local medical review policies, or that the patient's diagnosis or procedure does not meet the Medicare program standards for medical necessity.</p>

<p>The ABN is intended to provide the patient advanced notice that it is likely the procedure will be denied and allows the patient to make an informed decision whether to receive the service for which he or she may be personally responsible. Claims for such services may be submitted with either the HCPCS modifier "GA" ("waiver of liability statement issued as required by payer policy") or "GX" ("notice of liability issued, voluntary under payer policy").   If the service is denied and a signed ABN is not on file, the physician may not hold the patient responsible for payment.</p>

<p>There may be instances in which the service to be rendered is expected to be denied however a signed ABN was not obtained because the patient refused to sign it. If this is the case, the physician may choose not to render the service, unless the health and safety of the patient is at risk. Another scenario might be that the patient presents a medical emergency and under great duress in which EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act) provisions apply and therefore could not have been provided with an ABN prior to rendering treatment. In these situations, the claim may be submitted to Medicare, however the modifier "GZ" should be included on the claim form to indicate "item or service expected to be denied as not reasonable and necessary." Although in these situations Medicare will most likely hold the provider financially liable.</p>

<p>Remember it is unlawful to provide the ABN on a routine indiscriminate basis. The ABN is not intended to be a blanket statement to protect a physician from financial liability. Generic ABNs simply stating "Medicare will likely deny this service" are also unacceptable. The ABN should be provided when there is a specific reason to believe the service will be denied and the specific reason should be indicated.</p>

<p>Recent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) changes to the ABN process included revision to the ABN form itself making the Notice of Exclusions from Medicare Benefits (NEMB) form essentially obsolete. A <a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/BNI/02_ABNGABNL.asp">revised version of the Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) form</a> became available March 3, 2008 and fully implemented September 1, 2008. The revised form has a new name: "Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage" however is still referred to as the "ABN". The cost-estimate field is new to the final form and critical to remaining in compliance. It is therefore mandatory to complete this field. The form should continue to be provided to Medicare beneficiaries before rendering a service that is likely to be denied by Medicare.</p>

<ul class="bullet">
<li><p>It is a consolidated version of the two existing ABN forms, the ABN-G for general services and the ABN-L for lab services, so it replaces both;</p></li>

<li><p>it may replace the use of the Notice of Exclusion from Medicare Benefits form (NEMB);</p></li>

<li><p>provides a field to indicate the cost estimate of the service(s) being performed (mandatory); and</p></li>

<li><p>it includes a new option for beneficiaries that allows them to choose a service for which they will pay out-of-pocket, without having a claim submitted to Medicare</p></li>
</ul>

<p>The revised form and instructions are available on the <a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/BNI/02_ABNGABNL.asp">Beneficiary Notices page of the CMS Web site</a>.</p>

<p>Medicare does not require claims to be submitted for non-covered services, such as dental care, cosmetic surgery, preventative medicine, and routine physical examinations. However, if the patient believes that a service may be covered, requests that a claim be submitted, or wishes to receive a formal Medicare determination for consideration by a supplemental insurance, a claim for the non-covered service must be submitted.</p>

<p>When submitting a claim for non-covered services, you may wish to apply the HCPCS modifier "GY" to the procedure code to indicate an item or service that is statutorily excluded or does not meet the definition of any Medicare benefit. Even though Medicare will "auto-deny" any procedure with the "GY" modifier, applying the modifier may speed the claims process and allow the patient to submit a claim to another carrier sooner.  The "GY" may appear in addition to the "GX" when appropriate.</p>

<p>An ABN is not required when submitting claims for non-covered services, but rather is voluntary in these situations. Many providers prefer providing Medicare patients written notice that the service to be rendered is excluded from Medicare benefits. Doing so assures them that the patient has acknowledged that they will be responsible for payment. The ABN in these situations allows the patient to make an informed decision about whether or not they want to receive the service or treatment knowing that they will be personally financially responsible, and also allows them to be more active in their own health care treatment decisions.</p>

<p>Before electing to not obtain a signed ABN or submit a claim, it is imperative that you be certain that the service is statutorily excluded. If you charge a patient your standard fee for services that may possibly be covered, you may be charged with violating Medicare policy, and risk penalties or exclusion from Medicare and other federal health programs.</p>

<p>For more information or to download a copy of the ABN you may visit the <a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/BNI/01_overview.asp">Beneficiary Notices Section of the CMS Web site</a>.</p>

<h4>Local Coverage Decisions (LCD)</h4>

<p>For those who find it difficult to determine whether a procedure is a covered Medicare benefit, Medicare has made it easier by posting national and local coverage policies on the <a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/search.asp">CMS Web site</a>. The Medicare Coverage Database allows a search for local and national policy by CPT code or by keyword.</p>

<p>Moreover, according to CMS Program Memorandum dated January 3, 2003, as of April 1, 2003, providers may notice a new remittance advice remark code "N115" accompanying procedures that were denied due to a local coverage decision. This will ease the tensions with determining when to provide an ABN.</p>

<blockquote>N115 - "This decision was based on a local coverage decision (LCD).   An LCD provides a guide to assist in determining whether a particular item or service is covered. A copy of this policy is available at <a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/search.asp">www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/search.asp</a>."</blockquote>

<p>Now that LCDs are easily accessible it is important to review your Medicare carrier's policies as interpretations of Medicare policy may vary from state to state. For example, some carriers will reimburse for the removal of tori, while others consider it an excluded service.</p>]]></description>
 </item>
 <item>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>New Regulatory Compliance Resource for AAOMS Members</title>
 <link>http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=117</link>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=117</guid>
 <author>webadmin@aaoms.org (Webmaster)</author>
 <description><![CDATA[<p>AAOMS continues to monitor health policy trends and regulatory compliance issues that may affect AAOMS members.  AAOMS will frequently post announcements of such key regulations on the AAOMS website, in the AAOMS Today and Advocacy E-Newsletter. There have been several federal regulations recently introduced with which most providers, including OMSs, must comply over the next few years.  The compliance dates for each of these regulations are relatively close to one another.  To assist members in developing their compliance plans, <a href="http://www.aaoms.org/compliance.php">a compliance web page</a> has been developed to provide a quick glance at each regulation, as well as a summary and projected timeline for implementation and compliance.  For additional information, links to AAOMS resources and links to outside governmental agencies are provided. Be sure to add the page to your list of internet favorites!</p> ]]></description>
 </item>
 <item>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>New Enrollment Rule for Providers who Order and / or Refer Items or Services for Medicare Beneficiaries</title>
 <link>http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=116</link>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=116</guid>
 <author>webadmin@aaoms.org (Webmaster)</author>
 <description><![CDATA[<p>The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has delayed, until April 5, 2010, a new rule relating to provider enrollment, with further delay being pushed by a CMS Advisory Board called the Practicing Physicians Advisory Council (PPAC), the American Medical Association as well as at least 56 other medical groups.  The purpose of the rule is to ensure claims requiring referring or ordering physician/health care practitioner information are paid only when the referring or ordering physician/health care practitioner is found in Medicare's PECOS (Provider Enrollment, Chain and Ownership System) database and as such, is a provider eligible to refer and/or order under Medicare.</p>

<p>This new rule may affect OMSs, especially those enrolled prior to 2003 when Medicare began using the PECOS database, as well as general dentists that order and/or refer but have never enrolled in the Medicare program.  To continue to order or refer for Medicare beneficiaries a provider, including OMSs, must be registered in PECOS.  The AAOMS encourages all members to verify their enrollment information in the <a href="https://pecos.cms.hhs.gov/">Internet-based PECOS system</a>, regardless as to when enrolled in Medicare.  A recent <a href="http://op.bna.com/hl.nsf/id/sfak-7y3u35/$File/CMS%20Provider Memo.pdf">CMS memorandum</a> provides specific instructions for re-enrolling providers initially enrolled more than six years ago.  It also makes clear that any dentist that orders or refers items or services must be enrolled.  If a required referring or ordering physician/health care practitioner listed on a claim is not in PECOS (or in some cases, the Medicare carrier's "master provider file"), the claim of the provider that actually carries out the referred or ordered item or service will not be paid.</p>]]></description>
 </item>
 <item>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>CMS to Stop Payment for Consultation Codes Effective January 1</title>
 <link>http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=115</link>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=115</guid>
 <author>webadmin@aaoms.org (Webmaster)</author>
 <description><![CDATA[<p>The 2010 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule released in the November 25 Federal Register, finalizes CMS's proposal to stop making payment for consultation codes (with the exception of G codes used to bill for telehealth consultations). The resulting savings will be redistributed in a budget neutral fashion, increasing payments for existing evaluation and management (E/M) services. CMS will adjust the payment for the surgical global period to reflect the higher value of the office visits furnished during the global period. CMS cites various rationales for this new policy including, but not limited to: (1) differential payment for a consultation service is no longer supported because documentation requirements are now similar across all E/M services, (2) local policy interpretations by Medicare contractors are not universally equivalent or acceptable to the physician community resulting in denials in different localities, and (3) terms such as referral, transfer and consultation, used interchangeably by physicians in clinical settings, confuse the actual meaning of a consultation service and that interpretation of these words varies greatly among members of that community as some label a transfer as a referral and others label a consultation as a referral.</p>

<p>A recent <a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/transmittals/downloads/R1875CP.pdf">CMS Transmittal</a> and <a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/MM6740.pdf">MLN Matters article</a> further explain what this means for providers.</p>

<p>Some important points to note:</p>

<ul class="bullet">
<li><p>The new policy only applies to physicians billing the Medicare fee-for-service program. It does not apply to Medicare Advantage or non-Medicare insurers.</p></li>

<li><p>In the inpatient hospital setting and nursing facility setting, any physicians and qualified NPPs who perform an initial evaluation may bill an initial hospital care visit code (CPT code 99221 - 99223) or nursing facility care visit code (CPT 99304 - 99306), where appropriate.  This means more than one provider can report a code in the 99221 - 99223 range on the same day for the same patient.  The principal physician of record will append modifier "-AI" Principal Physician of Record, to the E/M code when billed. This modifier will identify the physician who oversees the patient's care from all other physicians who may be furnishing specialty care. All other physicians who perform an initial evaluation on this patient will bill only the E/M code for the complexity level performed.  However, claims that include the "-AI" modifier on codes other than the initial hospital and nursing home visit codes (i.e., subsequent care codes or outpatient codes) will not be rejected and returned to the physician or provider.</p></li>

<li><p>Emergency department visits (codes 99281 - 99288) - physician billing for emergency department services provided to patient by both patient's personal physician and emergency department (ED) physician. If the ED physician, based on the advice of the patient's personal physician who came to the emergency department to see the patient, sends the patient home, then the ED physician should bill the appropriate level of emergency department service. The patient's personal physician should also bill the level of emergency department code that describes the service he or she provided in the emergency department. If the patient's personal physician does not come to the hospital to see the patient, but only advises the ED physician by telephone, then the patient's personal physician may not bill.</p></li>
</ul>

<p>For additional information be sure to read the <a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/transmittals/downloads/R1875CP.pdf">CMS Transmittal</a> and <a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/MM6740.pdf">MLN Matters article</a>.  AAOMS will continue to monitor this issue to keep you informed.</p>]]></description>
 </item>
 <item>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Changes to Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage (ABN) Modifiers</title>
 <link>http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=114</link>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=114</guid>
 <author>webadmin@aaoms.org (Webmaster)</author>
 <description><![CDATA[<p>OMSs billing Medicare need to be aware of a change affecting any claim submitted for a patient to whom the ABN has been provided. The ABN should still be provided to a Medicare patient prior to rendering a service that Medicare typically covers, however, will likely deny on the particular occasion due to, for instance, the patient's diagnosis not meeting Medicare medical necessity criteria. What has changed is explained in <a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ContractorLearningResources/downloads/JA6563.pdf">MLN Matters article MM6563</a>. A new (Health Care Procedure Coding System) HCPCS level II modifier has been created to describe the voluntary use of the ABN while an existing modifier has been updated to reflect required use of the liability notice. In the past, there were two separate forms (ABN and Notice of Exclusion from Medicare Benefits (NEMB)) that helped distinguish the usage, however, they were consolidated in 2008.</p>

<p>HCPCS modifier -GA has been revised to mean "waiver of liability statement issued as required by payer policy" and a new modifier, -GX, has been created to describe "notice of liability issued, voluntary under payer policy". An example of when the -GX modifier would be appended to a code on the claim form would be routine dentoalveolar surgery. Keep in mind, the claim technically would not have to be submitted if the service is one that is statutorily excluded from Medicare, such as extractions not prior to radiation treatment. If, however, a patient insisted the claim be filed, the -GY modifier (item or service statutorily excluded or does not meet the definition of any Medicare benefit) would appear in addition to the -GX modifier. Medicare will automatically assign beneficiary liability to any claim where the -GA or -GX is present. The new modifiers must be used effective April 1, 2010.</p>]]></description>
 </item>
 <item>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>PHISHING SCAM  - CDC Sponsored State Vaccination Program for H1N1</title>
 <link>http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=112</link>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=112</guid>
 <author>webadmin@aaoms.org (Webmaster)</author>
 <description><![CDATA[<p>CDC has received reports of fraudulent emails (phishing) referencing a CDC sponsored State Vaccination Program for H1N1. The messages request that users create a personal H1N1 (swine flu) Vaccination Profile on the CDC.gov web site.</p>

<p>An example of the phishing email can be found through this link: <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/hoaxes_rumors.html">http://www.cdc.gov/hoaxes_rumors.html</a></p>

<p>Users that click on the embedded link in the email are at risk of having malicious code installed on their system. CDC reminds users to take the following steps to reduce the risk of being a victim of a phishing attack:</p>

<ul class="bullet">
<li>Do not open or respond to unsolicited email messages</li>
<li>Do not click links embedded in emails from unknown senders</li>
<li>Use caution when entering personal information online</li>
<li>Update anti-virus, spyware, firewall, and anti-spam software regularly</li>
</ul>]]></description>
 </item>
 <item>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>CDC Updates H1N1 Guidance</title>
 <link>http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=111</link>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=111</guid>
 <author>webadmin@aaoms.org (Webmaster)</author>
 <description><![CDATA[<p>CDC has updated its <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/OralHealth/infectioncontrol/factsheets/2009_h1n1.htm">guidance on preventing transmission of 2009 H1N1 influenza in dental health care settings</a>.  Specific recommendations include encouraging all personnel to receive the seasonal and H1N1 influenza vaccines, screening patients through reminder calls and at check-in for possible flu-like symptoms in order to reschedule non-urgent care for patients with influenza-like illness, and using an airborne infection isolation room, N95 respirators, and infection control measures for personnel or urgent care patients with influenza-like illness.</p>]]></description>
 </item>
 <item>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>Practice Management Notes: Business associates &amp;mdash; what has changed?</title>
 <link>http://www.aaoms.org/docs/pm_notes/2009_12.pdf</link>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.aaoms.org/docs/pm_notes/2009_12.pdf</guid>
 <author>webadmin@aaoms.org (Webmaster)</author>
 <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.aaoms.org/docs/pm_notes/2009_12.pdf">http://www.aaoms.org/docs/pm_notes/2009_12.pdf</a></p>]]></description>
 </item>
 <item>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
 <title>New Medicare enrollment forms to be used by November 30, 2009</title>
 <link>http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=109</link>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.aaoms.org/pm_news.php?id=109</guid>
 <author>webadmin@aaoms.org (Webmaster)</author>
 <description><![CDATA[<p>Changes have been made to the <a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/CMSforms/downloads/CMS855B.pdf">CMS-855I</a> (for physicians and non-physicians) and <a href="http://www.cms.hhs.gov/CMSforms/downloads/CMS855I.pdf">CMS-855B</a> (for medical groups and clinics) that takes effect on November 30.</p>

<p>CMS has made mostly minor edits to the forms, such as using "Final Adverse Actions" instead of "Adverse Legal Actions," throughout the form. Section 17 of the new CMS-855I does not ask you to check off documents that you are attaching such as a medical license, DEA or medical school certificate, however, your contractor will use the Internet to verify information in an effort to minimize the amount of supporting documentation you are required to send. They will search state and school databases to verify that information is correct. Your carrier may request copies of a degree or certificate when information can't be verified online.</p>

<p>If you've recently used and sent an old application carriers are instructed to accept older versions of the forms with "02/08" in the bottom-left corner until Nov. 30. You can continue using the 855B and 855I forms marked with 02/08 up until Nov. 30 - but those forms must be in your carrier's hands by Nov. 30.</p>

<p>Other changes to the 855I include:</p>

<ul class="bullet">
<li>removing the reference to the Healthcare Integrity and Protection Data Bank from pg. 12</li>
<li>clarifying a "individual (type 1) NPI" should be provided on pg. 4;</li>
<li>revising and clarifying #2 on the Certification Statement on pg. 25; and</li>
<li>adding the phrase "(blue preferred)" after "All signatures must be original and signed in ink" on pg. 26.</li>
</ul>

<p>Specific changes to CMS-855B are:</p>

<ul class="bullet">
<li>removed "Slide Preparation Facility" from pages 1 and 9</li>
<li>removed "Public Health/Welfare Agency" from pg. 9;</li>
<li>removed the sentence "If you are a single specialty clinic/group practice, the specialty must be reported" from page 9; and</li>
<li>removed the reference to the Healthcare Integrity and Protection Data Bank from pg. 11.</li>
</ul>

<p>To obtain more information you can visit the CMS website.</p>]]></description>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>